Posts Tagged prohibition

1: Which of the following was a long-term effect of Prohibition…?

Question by Boggs: 1: Which of the following was a long-term effect of Prohibition…?
1: Which of the following was a long-term effect of Prohibition?
the consumer economy

the growth of organized crime

an end to alcoholism in the United States

the rise of fundamentalism

2: William Jennings Bryan took up the cause of fundamentalist Christians
at speakeasies in Chicago

on new buses to the suburbs

at the Scopes trial

in Hollywood studios

3: Key features of Republican administrations of the 1920s included
expansionism and business regulation

isolationism and laissez-faire business policy

a buildup of armaments and armed forces

reduction of quotas and increased immigration

Best answer:

Add your own answer in the comments!

  • Share/Bookmark

, , ,

1 Comment

Why don’t Feminists ever claim credit for Prohibition?

Question by diehard: Why don’t Feminists ever claim credit for Prohibition?
Feminists always claim they got women universal suffrage and that Susan B. Anthony was a Feminist, so why don’t that also take credit for the Temperance Movement as well? Suffragettes weren’t Feminists, and the group of women who started to call themselves Feminists came in on the tail end of the Suffragette Movement in the last 10 years, while Susan B. Anthony was also active in the Temperance Movement– comprised almost entirely of women– which sought to protect women and children from abusive drunken husbands, so shouldn’t Feminists also be claiming loudly that Feminism was responsible for The 18th Amendment?

Why are they so silent on their work in passing Prohibition?

“Some of the most notable figures associated with the U.S. temperance movement were Susan B. Anthony, Frances E. Willard and Carry A. Nation (the latter worked on her own). The effects of their efforts and thousands of other advocates included:

* Government regulation
* Instruction on alcoholism in schools
* Energized study of alcoholism.”

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1054.html

Wild Sage: So are the Suffragettes (Feminists) who worked to get Universal Suffrage for women, but I see women claiming how Feminists got women the right to vote practically ever day…

Heathen: The Woman’s Christian Temperance Movement was only one of the many Temperance groups worldwide. I’m sure some of them weren’t Christians, but I’ll wager even the Feminists then were Christian as well…

Best answer:

Answer by Max Power
Feminist stopped getting laid when alcohol was banned. They fixed that during the second wave.

Add your own answer in the comments!

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , ,

3 Comments

Why don’t more people like the idea of ending DRUG PROHIBITION? Alchohol prohibition was a disaster!……

Prohibition only creates crime and related social harms. This was the case in the 1920s with alcohol, and it is the case now with currently illegal drugs. It does not matter if you are for or against people using drugs. Prohibition does NOT WORK, and it costs far too much to continue.

I never really thought it through when I was younger. It was very simple to me: Drugs are bad, therefore they should be illegal. That was all of the thought I put into it, because I did not think beyond the propaganda that I heard every day in school. I did not think about all of the problems that prohibition causes (even though I had studied prohibition at one point), and I think that most people are pretty much brainwashed by the same propaganda, so most of us don’t bother to think about the negative impact that the “WAR ON DRUGS” has on our society.

If you do not think we should change the laws, then you support drug UNcontrol. Prohibition means NO regulation, and NO control because drugs are pushed underground into criminality. Prohibition does not stop people from making, selling, buying or using drugs. All it does is make drugs impossible to control. The most optimistic reports show that we only interdict 10-15% of drug traffic. That means that prohibition is 85% to 90% ineffective. That also means that we have NO control over recreational substances.

It does not matter if you are for or against drug use. Prohibition is an abject failure. If we put a stop to this irresponsible and detrimental “WAR”, our country could experience a huge DECREASE in:

-Crime (Crime is higher as a result of the war on drugs. In particular, homicides have skyrocketed – 10 per 100,000 – the only other time the homicide rate was so high was during alcohol prohibition. After prohibition, the murder rates dropped by more than HALF)

-Disease,

-Government Spending (A RAND corporation study showed that each dollar spent on education and treatment is 7 times more effective than a dollar spent on criminal interdiction, yet we spend more than 45 BILLION DOLLARS per year on criminal interdiction and incarceration costs, and less than 4 billion dollars on education, treatment, and prevention.
),

-Prison Population (According to the American Corrections Association, the average daily cost per state prison inmate per day in the US in 2005 was $67.55. That means it costs states approximately $16,948,295 per day to imprison drug offenders, or $6,186,127,675 per year),

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm

-Gangs and Organized Crime (gangs are a product of drug prohibition),

-Corrupt Police (Who wants to live in a police state?),

-Drug Trafficking (obvious reasons),

-Drugs Use among Teens (Drug use INCREASED 7 fold among 12-17 year olds after the modern War on Drugs started. The economics of prohibition favors the targeting of youths. Drug dealers don’t ask for ID),

-Graffiti (Gang tagging creates an enormous graffiti problem causing millions of dollars in damage every year. The gangs are a product of drug prohibition)

-Deaths due to overdose,

-car accidents caused by high speed chases (Where a driver is afraid of being caught with illegal drugs),

-divorce rate (parents would not be separated from the family due to petty possession convictions),

-GUN CONTROL – we have increasingly strict gun control laws because the crime wave that rides on prohibition has caused huge public outcry. Rather than focus on the cause of crime (socioeconomic factors of the drug war are a major component), the public and legislators lash out at gun owners. This would practically REMOVE the government’s pretext to ban guns!

Since Nixon started the modern war on drugs, use among teens is up 7 times. This is because the black market created by prohibition makes underage teens a very easy target. The result is that illegal drugs run rampant through every high school in America. But alcohol, as a legal drug, is much harder for a minor to obtain.

We must remove the profit incentive in the black market for recreational substances – the only way to do that is to end prohibition and replace it with regulation. Congress is granted the power to “regulate commerce”. “Regulate”, to the writers of the Constitution, meant to facilitate the proper functioning of, as when someone regulates a clock to keep proper time, or the barrels of a double rifle to hit the same point of aim

The Rand corporation’s study showed that every dollar spent on education or treatment programs is 7 times more effective that a dollar spent on criminal interdictions. If recreational substances were made available through a regulated and taxed means, just like alcohol, we could focus far more money on education and treatment and as a result, lower drug use and provide for a healthier society. The resultant reduction in crime will provide safer streets for police and citizens, and allow the police to concentrate on real crimes, such as violent crimes. This was one of the rationales behind the repeal of Alcohol Prohibition, and it is still a good idea.

In Holland where both Marijuana and Heroin are legally available, they have HALF the percentage of Marijuana users as in the US, and a THIRD the percentage of heroin users. If heroin were legal tomorrow would you shoot up? No, neither would I. The people that would use heroin already use it, and obtain it through the black market. Available through regulated channels, it would simply end the crime ridden black markets, and promote a healthy environment free of HIV, AIDS, Hepatitis and overdoses.

Prohibition policies are based on fiction. They destroy society by creating an environment of crime and corruption, as well as giving government “Big Brother” powers over the lives, recreational habits, and choices of all citizens.

And prohibition policies create vast bureaucracies. And the lies and propaganda which these bureaucracies must create and disseminate, in order to prop up their fiction, can cause aware and thinking people to develop a tragic deep and permanent distrust of the government, of the hardworking people in law enforcement, and of the political process.

Prohibition and the forces that support it are enemies of liberty and domestic tranquility. While there may be issues with the use, and sometimes abuse, of various recreational drugs like alcohol, those issues and those people that abuse should be dealt with directly, instead of creating an unregulated black market that feeds the mouth of crime. That is all prohibition has ever done, and will ever do.

http://www.drugwarfaq.com/

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-157.html

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm

The first web site is very informative about the considerable number of problems that the “WAR ON DRUGS” has given us. I recommend that you read it in its entirety. I do not agree with everything he says, but there is a lot of good info there.
saturn, you didn’t read any of this question, did you?
i agree, whcwarrior. The war on drugs is a PRIODUCT OF LIBERALISM.

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , ,

7 Comments

From Prohibition to AA


An interview with Dr. Stanton Peele. Produced and directed by Patrick and Andrea Bergin. Copyright First Vision Productions 2003.

  • Share/Bookmark

,

17 Comments

What’s the greatest evil drug prohibition or drug addiction?

Drug prohibition increases the price of illegal drugs which makes traffick very profitable which creates drug related violence which funds terrorism which puts in jail 80% of jail inmates who then learn how to be better dealers and progress in their careers to bigger more violent crimes.

Drug addiction is a personal curse but if drugs were cheap there would be no need to resort to crime to get them and the consequences would be much less extended to society than the consequences of drug prohibition.

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , ,

4 Comments

Why don’t we reinforce prohibition of alcohol if Marijuana is such a harmful drug?

I don’t understand why Marijuana is Illegal when the long term side effects of the drug is just as bad as alcohol.

All as I see with Marijuana being an Illegal substance is Crime and my tax dollars paying to keep a Pot head in jail, and loss of tax revenue.

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , ,

9 Comments