Posts Tagged drugs
newest Law Drugs News
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on January 1, 2011
Law to affect how some pay for over-the-counter medicines
The coming year will change how millions of Americans pay for medicines from Prilosec to Tylenol, a result of an obscure provision in new health care law.
Read more on Chillicothe Gazette
Some health-care law provisions now on the books
The new year will bring important changes to U.S. health-insurance rules, as some provisions related to the new health-care law take effect.
Read more on Seattle Times
Carrboro man sentenced for drugs, weapons, child abuse
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on December 3, 2010
Carrboro man sentenced for drugs, weapons, child abuse
Carrboro man sentenced for drugs, weapons, child abuse – HILLSBOROUGH – A judge sentenced a Carrboro man to
Read more on Burlington Times-News
Amid furor over immig law, Calder?n visits U.S.
share: digg facebook twitter Obama will reiterate his support for comprehensive immigration reform when he and Calderón meet for lunch to discuss bilateral issues, a senior administration official said. In a speech to Congress on Thursday, Calderon is expected to raise the issue of immigration, but also touch on the partnership with U.S. lawmakers, who approved .3 billion in aid to help Mexico …
Read more on San Antonio Express-News
in the partition law say for drugs what is the difference between the activity,solubility and concentration?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on November 22, 2010
Question by israa_iso: in the partition law say for drugs what is the difference between the activity,solubility and concentration?
why in the dilute solutions the activity is equal to the concentration considering the partition law
and what is the difference between the affinity(activity)of drug in 2 immiscible solutions and its concentration?
Best answer:
Answer by Drew
Here is some information related to solubility and the Law of Partition:
http://books.google.com/books?id=W0MAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103&dq=partition+law+solubility&source=web&ots=LC0WVz43N2&sig=bWiACNq59GpQNwzjcAx1HJS8YFE&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=result#PPA103,M1
Concerning activity:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v199/n4888/abs/199065a0.html
More info:
Physical Chemistry for the Biomedical Sciences
http://books.google.com/books?id=LA_8QzoCNMsC&pg=PA129&lpg=PA129&dq=partition+law+solvent+extraction&source=web&ots=B4m85tCHnW&sig=WnSvqs5QYVHBa1VFvAzyBid4zOM&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=9&ct=result
ScienceNet:
http://www.science.edu.sg/ssc/detailed.jsp?artid=2437&type=6&root=5&parent=5&cat=51
Hope this helps!
Give your answer to this question below!
newest Law Drugs News
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on October 5, 2010
hide drug!

Image by m.a.r.c.
Law enforcement names prescription diversion ‘daily’ issue in High Country
Caleb W. Bevil died when he was 12 years old. After being found unconscious in his Dunn home on April 23, 2008, Bevil was transported to WakeMed hospital in Raleigh, where he eventually died three days later. An autopsy showed that his blood contained a lethal dose of the painkiller methadone—the same methadone that belonged to his mother’s boyfriend, James Hardee, who most likely used the drug …
Read more on The Appalachian
FBI: Federal judge bought drugs from stripper
A long-time federal judge is facing drug and firearms charges after a stripper-turned-informant told authorities he used cocaine, marijuana and other illegal drugs with her. Illegal drug trade – Drugs – Health – Cocaine – Federal Bureau of Investigation
Read more on MSNBC
House hopefuls say pot law needs work
All three candidates seeking the open House District 3 seat agree that the state’s medical marijuana law may need some adjusting.
Read more on Daily Inter Lake
What is the Irish law regarding drugs?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on October 2, 2010
Question by mags: What is the Irish law regarding drugs?
I’ve combed the internet and just can’t find anything that can help me. I want to know what happens if your caught with class A drugs.. not selling them but using them [ eg Ectasy ]]. If your over the age of 18. and your a first time offender? Do you get automatically imprisioned or fined or what??
Thank you.
Best answer:
Answer by queenie_lori
Possession of controlled drugs – cannabis or cannabis resinUnder the Misuse of Drugs Acts anyone found in possession of cannabis or cannabis resin is guilty of an offence. If the court decides that the drug was for personal use and not for sale or distribution and this was a first offence, it can impose a fine not exceeding €381 on summary conviction in a District Court. On conviction on indictment, the defendant can be fined €635. For a second offence, a fine not exceeding €508 may be imposed and on conviction on indictment, a fine of €1,270 can be imposed. For a third or subsequent conviction, a fine not exceeding €1,270 can be imposed. If the court decides, a prison sentence of not more than 12 months can be imposed as well. On conviction on indictment, the court may decide on an appropriate fine and/or a prison sentence of up to three years can be imposed.
Possession of any other controlled drugsIt is an offence to be in possession of a controlled drug and on summary conviction for this offence, you could be liable for a fine not exceeding €1,270 or a prison sentence of no longer than 12 months. If the court decides, you could be liable for both. On conviction on indictment for possessing controlled drugs, the court can decide on an appropriate fine and you could also be liable for a prison sentence of not more than seven years. Again, if the court decides, you could be liable for both.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Why make any drugs illegal for adults? Can it be proven that drug laws make our society any better?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on August 13, 2010
Question by guitarman: Why make any drugs illegal for adults? Can it be proven that drug laws make our society any better?
Why not just let adults put what they want in their bodies? Why should the government or any authority figure have a say in this? Why do adult citizens even allow the government to control their lives like this? Why the need for the nanny state type laws? Why not just legalize it all and let the free market run its course? Why all of the intervention by government? Why not let the market decide if drugs are a good thing or not?
Best answer:
Answer by katmandu_85219
Study China’s problems with drugs before you decide if it is a good thing or a bad thing.
We are not stronger or morally superior to the Chinese.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Do you believe that by increasing law enforcement resources, importation of drugs can be completely eliminated?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on July 26, 2010
Question by Leigh: Do you believe that by increasing law enforcement resources, importation of drugs can be completely eliminated?
Do you believe that by increasing law enforcement resources, importation of drugs can be completely eliminated? Why or why not?
Best answer:
Answer by Bob G…The return of
No. The drug war always will be a failure.
Instead, I believe that by decriminalizing drugs the problem associated with them can be drastically reduced. Revenue also would be increased.
I do not use drugs or even drink alcohol.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
What are the law consequences if caught with drugs?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on July 26, 2010
Question by Bree: What are the law consequences if caught with drugs?
What are the law consequences if caught with illegal drugs, smoking or drinking alcohol underage ?
What are the consequences if teenagers are caught?
I’m doing a persuasive speech on substance abuse, and I need to know some things about why it is illegal to take drugs ect..
Best answer:
Answer by Arthur Math Ace
depends what drugs, where, how much and circumstances like dui etc. try to find info on your state’s website.
Give your answer to this question below!
Chemical imbalance: New drugs defy ban
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on July 26, 2010
Chemical imbalance: New drugs defy ban
WHILE legislation banning all mind-altering drugs is just days away from becoming law, manufacturers of head shop products are still busily churning out new drugs.
Read more on Irish Examiner
AP sources: Evidence that mother, son had taken drugs before NYC apartment fire where 5 died
NEW YORK – Investigators say a New York City mother and son who died in a suspected murder-suicide and arson had ingested some type of drug. Two law enforcement officials told The Associated Press on Monday there were traces of drugs in the bodies of Leisa Jones and her 14-year-old son.
Read more on Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune
Two New Tuberculosis (TB) Drugs Show Significant Synergy In Vitro
Sequella, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing drugs for treatment of life-threatening infectious diseases, announced today the publication of studies in the scientific journal Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy on synergy between SQ109, its lead drug candidate for the treatment of TB, and TMC207, Tibotec lead TB drug candidate.
Read more on BioresearchOnline
Q&A: Americans are willing to break the law to get illegal drugs. They enrich drug dealers who then corrupt?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on July 26, 2010
Question by johnfarber2000: Americans are willing to break the law to get illegal drugs. They enrich drug dealers who then corrupt?
public officials. Our jails are full and that is costing huge amounts of money. This is similar to when selling alcohol wasagainst the law. The gangs and gansters prospered, judges, police and other public officials were bought and society suffered. Should we legalize it, control it, tax it and put the drugs cartel out of business. Educate the public and treat addicts as well.
Best answer:
Answer by plazmaplanna
i agree, if drugs were commercialized then there would be way less shady buisness.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Are the law enforcement and fight to eradicate drugs hopeless?
Posted by admin in Drug & Alcohol Laws on July 26, 2010
Question by A Military Veteran (Erudite): Are the law enforcement and fight to eradicate drugs hopeless?
I’m 62 years old. Why is it that after 40 years of trying to stop drugs there are just as many drugs available on the street as the year 1968? After billions spent to stop drugs the law enforcement teams still can’t stop the flow of drugs.
Best answer:
Answer by Moose
Yes, completely.
Follow the money. Somebody is getting paid big time to continue the farce called the “war on drugs.” Prohibition of a commodity the public wants only raises the price and enriches the criminal, nothing more, nothing less. Drug laws are a bad, expensive, joke.
EDIT: Please notice the posts that argue for continued illegality. They are circular and never come up with a reason for drugs being illegal. Bad for you? So are fatty foods. We don’t arrest and incarcerate donut salesmen. Get over your God complex guys.
Add your own answer in the comments!
Does the “WAR ON DRUGS” actually create MORE CRIME, cause MORE PROBLEMS, and FURTHER INFLATE the GOVERNMENT?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 7, 2010
Prohibition only creates crime and related social harms. This was the case in the 1920s with alcohol, and it is the case now with currently illegal drugs. It does not matter if you are for or against people using drugs. Prohibition does NOT WORK, and it costs far too much to continue.
I never really thought it through when I was younger. It was very simple to me: Drugs are bad, therefore they should be illegal. That was all of the thought I put into it, because I did not think beyond the propaganda that I heard every day in school. I did not think about all of the problems that prohibition causes (even though I had studied prohibition at one point), and I think that most people are pretty much brainwashed by the same propaganda, so most of us don’t bother to think about the negative impact that the “WAR ON DRUGS” has on our society.
If you do not think we should change the laws, then you support drug UNcontrol. Prohibition means NO regulation, and NO control because drugs are pushed underground into criminality. Prohibition does not stop people from making, selling, buying or using drugs. All it does is make drugs impossible to control. The most optimistic reports show that we only interdict 10-15% of drug traffic. That means that prohibition is 85% to 90% ineffective. That also means that we have NO control over recreational substances.
It does not matter if you are for or against drug use. Prohibition is an abject failure. If we put a stop to this irresponsible and detrimental “WAR”, our country could experience a huge DECREASE in:
-Crime (Crime is higher as a result of the war on drugs. In particular, homicides have skyrocketed – 10 per 100,000 – the only other time the homicide rate was so high was during alcohol prohibition. After prohibition, the murder rates dropped by more than HALF)
-Disease and,
-Government Spending (A RAND corporation study showed that each dollar spent on education and treatment is 7 times more effective than a dollar spent on criminal interdiction, yet we spend more than 45 BILLION DOLLARS per year on criminal interdiction and incarceration costs, and less than 4 billion dollars on education, treatment, and prevention.
),
-Prison Population (According to the American Corrections Association, the average daily cost per state prison inmate per day in the US in 2005 was $67.55. That means it costs states approximately $16,948,295 per day to imprison drug offenders, or $6,186,127,675 per year),
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm
-Gangs and Organized Crime (gangs are a product of drug prohibition),
-Corrupt Police (Who wants to live in a police state?),
-Drug Trafficking (obvious reasons),
-Drugs Use among Teens (Drug use INCREASED 7 fold among 12-17 year olds after the modern War on Drugs started. The economics of prohibition favors the targeting of youths. Drug dealers don’t ask for ID),
-Graffiti (Gang tagging creates an enormous graffiti problem causing millions of dollars in damage every year. The gangs are a product of drug prohibition)
-Deaths due to overdose,
-car accidents caused by high speed chases (Where a driver is afraid of being caught with illegal drugs),
-divorce rate (parents would not be separated from the family due to petty possession convictions),
-GUN CONTROL – we have increasingly strict gun control laws because the crime wave that rides on prohibition has caused huge public outcry. Rather than focus on the cause of crime (socioeconomic factors of the drug war are a major component), the public and legislators lash out at gun owners. This would practically REMOVE the government’s pretext to ban guns!
Since Nixon started the modern war on drugs, use among teens is up 7 times. This is because the black market created by prohibition makes underage teens a very easy target. The result is that illegal drugs run rampant through every high school in America. But alcohol, as a legal drug, is much harder for a minor to obtain.
We must remove the profit incentive in the black market for recreational substances – the only way to do that is to end prohibition and replace it with regulation. Congress is granted the power to “regulate commerce”. “Regulate”, to the writers of the Constitution, meant to facilitate the proper functioning of, as when someone regulates a clock to keep proper time, or the barrels of a double rifle to hit the same point of aim
The Rand corporation’s study showed that every dollar spent on education or treatment programs is 7 times more effective that a dollar spent on criminal interdictions. If recreational substances were made available through a regulated and taxed means, just like alcohol, we could focus far more money on education and treatment and as a result, lower drug use and provide for a healthier society. The resultant reduction in crime will provide safer streets for police and citizens, and allow the police to concentrate on real crimes, such as violent crimes. This was one of the rationales behind the repeal of Alcohol Prohibition, and it is still a good idea.
In Holland where both Marijuana and Heroin are legally available, they have HALF the percentage of Marijuana users as in the US, and a THIRD the percentage of heroin users. If heroin were legal tomorrow would you shoot up? No, neither would I. The people that would use heroin already use it, and obtain it through the black market. Available through regulated channels, it would simply end the crime ridden black markets, and promote a healthy environment free of HIV, AIDS, Hepatitis and overdoses.
Prohibition policies are based on fiction. They destroy society by creating an environment of crime and corruption, as well as giving government “Big Brother” powers over the lives, recreational habits, and choices of all citizens.
And prohibition policies create vast bureaucracies. And the lies and propaganda which these bureaucracies must create and disseminate, in order to prop up their fiction, can cause aware and thinking people to develop a tragic deep and permanent distrust of the government, of the hardworking people in law enforcement, and of the political process.
Prohibition and the forces that support it are enemies of liberty and domestic tranquility. While there may be issues with the use, and sometimes abuse, of various recreational drugs like alcohol, those issues and those people that abuse should be dealt with directly, instead of creating an unregulated black market that feeds the mouth of crime. That is all prohibition has ever done, and will ever do.
http://www.drugwarfaq.com/
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-157.html
http://www.drugwarfacts.org/prison.htm
The first web site is very informative about the considerable number of problems that the “WAR ON DRUGS” has given us. I recommend that you read it in its entirety. I do not agree with everything he says, but there is a lot of good info there.
Why aren’t drugs legal, when there is so much money to be saved and made?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 4, 2010
From a business stand point, you’re looking at a market potentially as large and profitable as the tobacco or alcohol industries.
From a social stand point, you’re looking ending victimless crime and criminals.
From a financial stand point, less criminals means less inmates, less inmates means prison funding, less funding means less tax.
Less criminals also means less enforcement (ei. DEA & drug task forces), which means even lower taxes.
From a legal standpoint you’re looking at laws similar to those in place for alcohol and tobacco.
Everybody wins.
Drugs aren’t good but are they really that bad?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 3, 2010
Obvoiusly habitual drug use is bad for you, but so is habitual eating (obesity), excessive air breathing (hyperventilate), overworking (miss watching your kids grow up). All of thoughs things are necessities to life, but in excess they are harmful just like drugs. And if you believe the decriminalization of alcohol reduced crime by taking away the method criminals can provide a service and therefore make money and have power. Then shouldn’t drugs be regulated and controlled to ensure that people who have access to them are only people who are of age and able to make adult decisions for themselves. As well as being heavily taxed in order to fund treatment and prevention programs along with other social projects. All the while reducing expenses currently being used to fight the unwinable War on Drugs. This would take the power from criminals while enabling our country to openly and honestly confront its drug addicts. Those who disagree, have you experimented with drugs?
Bee Bee, no doubt drugs can have a horribly terrible effect on some people. But legal are not these effects did occur in your life. So if that was the outcome of your families experience in an illegal drug world, then couldn’t a world where drugs are legalized along with a tax funded prevention and treatment program produced a possibly better outcome for your family? And if you disagree then what would be a better alternative?
what do you think about lrgalizing all drugs?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 3, 2010
Prohibition does not prevent cannabis use by children or the mentally ill, the vulnerable populations whom we supposedly want to protect. Instead, cannabis prohibition makes it more difficult for parents, patients, society, doctors and law enforcement to control cannabis use.
The Drug War makes honest education about cannabis impossible, and leaves cannabis users marginalized in ways that make their lives more stressful.
This stress is unhealthy for everyone, but it is certainly most damaging to people with schizophrenia.
Cannabis prohibition is not merely a failure; it is a counterproductive fraud that is harming those whom we claim we want to protect.
There are currently more teens in treatment centers for marijuana in comparison to those admitted for alcohol.
Only an idiot would have to ask why alcohol is not the no#1 problem
after all alcohol is perfectly legal ( If you are 21.)
That is due to responsible people handling alcohol by way of the carding and id system.
Contraband markets make no age disgression.
Since the crackdown on tobacco there are 75% fewer teens trying or using tobacco.
However when it comes to cannabis and other illicit substances it’s a whole
other ball game.
Control, regulation and better education work prohibition, dose not.
Or as John Walters of the ondcp (Office for national drug control policy) calls it “ a war on drugs” (Sorry John but it’s true look at the Netherlands)
America loves a war even if it is on it’s own people.
One of several reason they don’t legalize drugs is not because of the harm of drugs,
But people would lose more money in the long run.
Some of the people behind the support of this irrational so called war are
The tobacco industry,
the alcohol and distilled spirit industry ( people simply don’t drink as much, or decide not to drink at all with cannabis meaning a decline in there sales.
The pharmaceutical corporations can not make money on whole or raw cannabis, but they can charge an arm and a leg for there synthetic Marinol (dronabinol) CIII.
The textile and paper industry would lose out from hemp production, sinse hemp dose not need to go through all the various processes that ordinary tree products would. Also it’s possible to get two harvest in one season.
However people don’t know the difference between industrial hemp and smokeable cannabis, yet they are able to distinguish between the two in other country’s like Germany, the UK , Netherlands and even Canada, but our `DEA agents are so dumb they cant tell the difference between a stalk and a bush.
Also people who have any knowledge of growing high quality cannabis will tell you that male plants should never be grown next to your high grade female plants,
(unless of course you want to pollinate for future seed production).
When it comes to farming hemp the males are left in tact to pollinate the females and produce as much seed as possible.
This would mean a seedy mess for the pot smoker to clean up and produce undesirable future generations of smokeable cannabis.
If anything, Hemp farming would be anti marijuana and would harm any outdoor pot farming within a one mile radius of any hemp farm.
The petroleum industry would also be affected, sinse almost everything that can be made from petroleum can be synthesized from hemp oil, everything from bio fuel to even plastics. If North America would use a third of it’s land for hemp production we could create enough bio fuel to supply an area the size of Canada.
Now also for a moment consider how many people are incarcerated over just cannabis who are currently in the prisons and jails.
If cannabis were legalized and all inmates serving time for cannabis were freed there would be an over abundance of empty cells, and millions of guards in this country would be no longer needed.
The prison building industry would almost be obsolete ( and if all drugs were legalized that would mean even more empty cells).
So the prison system must have some means of gaining more inmates.
Not to mention other areas such as treatment centers, probation.etc
or HIDTA high intensity drug traffic areas where money is fed in to law enforcement,
(they would miss there green $$$)
Drugs , not even alcohol are the cause of the fundamental ills of society, rather than checking people for the presence of drugs, they should first test people for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power.
Check out Law Enforcement Against Prohibition at
daughter’s father has visitation rights, but he is drinking and doing drugs and I cannot prove it.?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on July 3, 2010
My daughter’s father and I have a court ordered custody arrangement. The father was an alcoholic and drug user, and after he completed rehab I agreed to let him have visitations. We live in different states so his family picks her up and takes her to there home hours away. We recently became on ‘good terms’ and he began telling me scary things via the phone (shooting someone up with meth, drinking alcohol, living with a guy who uses drugs, how his mother is messed up on alcohol and xanax.) I am in fear of letting my daughter go out to see him now, but I don’t have any proof as to what he is doing except for what he tells me over the phone, which makes it difficult to take him to court. He won’t say anything incriminating over text messages or on my answering machine either. What can I do to protect my daughter?
Fort Kent woman gets probation for smuggling drugs
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on June 28, 2010
Fort Kent woman gets probation for smuggling drugs
A pharmacy technician from Fort Kent was sentenced Monday in U.S. District Court to five years of probation for attempting to import oxycodone into the country.
Read more on Bangor Daily News
How do you feel about Cindy McCain getting special treatment about drug addiction ,and stealing drugs ?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on June 26, 2010
She was addicted to pain killers ,and stole the drugs from her own organization.Then to top it off she didnt do any jail time .My guess (and its a very good one)thats because she is rich and she is married to a US senator.If it were you are I ,WOW we would still be in jail.
A Better Approach to Drugs and Alcohol
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on May 2, 2010
An interview with Dr. Stanton Peele. Produced and directed by Patrick and Andrea Bergin. Copyright First Vision Productions 2003.
drugs drugs drugs legalize it all,whats your thoughts?
Posted by admin in Uncategorized on April 28, 2010
Prohibition does not prevent cannabis use by children or the mentally ill, the vulnerable populations whom we supposedly want to protect. Instead, cannabis prohibition makes it more difficult for parents, patients, society, doctors and law enforcement to control cannabis use.
The Drug War makes honest education about cannabis impossible, and leaves cannabis users marginalized in ways that make their lives more stressful.
This stress is unhealthy for everyone, but it is certainly most damaging to people with schizophrenia.
Cannabis prohibition is not merely a failure; it is a counterproductive fraud that is harming those whom we claim we want to protect.
There are currently more teens in treatment centers for marijuana in comparison to those admitted for alcohol.
Only an idiot would have to ask why alcohol is not the no#1 problem
after all alcohol is perfectly legal ( If you are 21.)
That is due to responsible people handling alcohol by way of the carding and id system.
Contraband markets make no age disgression.
Since the crackdown on tobacco there are 75% fewer teens trying or using tobacco.
However when it comes to cannabis and other illicit substances it’s a whole
other ball game.
Control, regulation and better education work prohibition, dose not.
Or as John Walters of the ondcp (Office for national drug control policy) calls it “ a war on drugs” (Sorry John but it’s true look at the Netherlands)
America loves a war even if it is on it’s own people.
One of several reason they don’t legalize drugs is not because of the harm of drugs,
But people would lose more money in the long run.
Some of the people behind the support of this irrational so called war are
The tobacco industry,
the alcohol and distilled spirit industry ( people simply don’t drink as much, or decide not to drink at all with cannabis meaning a decline in there sales.
The pharmaceutical corporations can not make money on whole or raw cannabis, but they can charge an arm and a leg for there synthetic Marinol (dronabinol) CIII.
The textile and paper industry would lose out from hemp production, sinse hemp dose not need to go through all the various processes that ordinary tree products would. Also it’s possible to get two harvest in one season.
However people don’t know the difference between industrial hemp and smokeable cannabis, yet they are able to distinguish between the two in other country’s like Germany, the UK , Netherlands and even Canada, but our `DEA agents are so dumb they cant tell the difference between a stalk and a bush.
Also people who have any knowledge of growing high quality cannabis will tell you that male plants should never be grown next to your high grade female plants,
(unless of course you want to pollinate for future seed production).
When it comes to farming hemp the males are left in tact to pollinate the females and produce as much seed as possible.
This would mean a seedy mess for the pot smoker to clean up and produce undesirable future generations of smokeable cannabis.
If anything, Hemp farming would be anti marijuana and would harm any outdoor pot farming within a one mile radius of any hemp farm.
The petroleum industry would also be affected, sinse almost everything that can be made from petroleum can be synthesized from hemp oil, everything from bio fuel to even plastics. If North America would use a third of it’s land for hemp production we could create enough bio fuel to supply an area the size of Canada.
Now also for a moment consider how many people are incarcerated over just cannabis who are currently in the prisons and jails.
If cannabis were legalized and all inmates serving time for cannabis were freed there would be an over abundance of empty cells, and millions of guards in this country would be no longer needed.
The prison building industry would almost be obsolete ( and if all drugs were legalized that would mean even more empty cells).
So the prison system must have some means of gaining more inmates.
Not to mention other areas such as treatment centers, probation.etc
or HIDTA high intensity drug traffic areas where money is fed in to law enforcement,
(they would miss there green $$$)
Drugs , not even alcohol are the cause of the fundamental ills of society, rather than checking people for the presence of drugs, they should first test people for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power.
Also check out Law Enforcement Against Prohibition at
www.leap.cc




Recent Comments